5 Years After San Francisco Banned Face Recognition, Voters Ask for More Surveillance
San Francisco made historical past in 2019 when its Board of Supervisors voted to ban metropolis businesses together with the police division from utilizing face recognition. About two dozen different US cities have since adopted swimsuit. But on Tuesday, San Francisco voters appeared to show in opposition to the thought of limiting police know-how, backing a poll proposition that may make it simpler for metropolis police to deploy drones and different surveillance instruments.
Proposition E handed with 60 p.c of the vote and was backed by San Francisco mayor London Breed. It provides the San Francisco Police Department new freedom to put in public safety cameras and deploy drones with out oversight from the town’s Police Commission or Board of Supervisors. It additionally loosens a requirement that SFPD get clearance from the Board of Supervisors earlier than adopting new surveillance know-how, permitting approval to be sought any time throughout the first 12 months.
Matt Cagle, a senior workers legal professional with the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, says these adjustments depart the present ban on face recognition in place however loosen different vital protections. “We’re concerned that Proposition E will result in people in San Francisco being subject to unproven and dangerous technology,” he says. “This is a cynical attempt by powerful interests to exploit fears about crime and shift more power to the police.”
Mayor Breed and different backers have positioned it as a solution to concern about crime in San Francisco. Crime figures have broadly declined, however fentanyl has just lately pushed a rise in overdose deaths, and business downtown neighborhoods are nonetheless fighting pandemic-driven workplace and retail vacancies. The proposition was additionally supported by teams related to the tech business, together with the marketing campaign group GrowSF, which didn’t reply to a request for remark.
“By supporting the work of our police officers, expanding our use of technology, and getting officers out from behind their desks and onto our streets, we will continue in our mission to make San Francisco a safer city,” Mayor Breed mentioned in an announcement on the proposition passing. She famous that 2023 noticed the bottom crime charges in a decade within the metropolis—apart from a pandemic blip in 2020—with charges of property crime and violent crime persevering with to say no additional in 2024.
Proposition E additionally provides police extra freedom to pursue suspects in automotive chases and reduces paperwork obligations, together with when officers resort to make use of of drive.
Caitlin Seeley George, managing director and marketing campaign director for Fight for the Future, a nonprofit that has lengthy campaigned in opposition to the usage of face recognition, calls the proposition “a blow to the hard-fought reforms that San Francisco has championed in recent years to rein in surveillance.”
“By expanding police use of surveillance technology, while simultaneously reducing oversight and transparency, it undermines peoples’ rights and will create scenarios where people are at greater risk of harm,” George says.
Although Cagle of the ACLU shares her considerations that San Francisco residents will likely be much less protected, he says the town ought to retain its popularity for having catalyzed a US-wide pushback in opposition to surveillance. San Francisco’s 2019 ban on face recognition was adopted by about two dozen different cities, a lot of which additionally added new oversight mechanisms for police surveillance.
