Procès pour terrorisme d’ultragauche : la cause kurde en filigrane de l’accusation

Au centre du procès pour terrorisme d’ultragauche qui s’ouvre mardi 3 octobre à Paris – le premier depuis ­Action directe, au milieu des années 1990 –, il y a la figure de Florian D. Cet homme, aujourd’hui âgé de 39 ans, est présenté comme le chef de « l’association de malfaiteurs terroriste » pour laquelle sept personnes sont renvoyées devant la 16e chambre correctionnelle. Elles encourent toutes jusqu’à dix années de prison.

Florian D.’s trajectory is the origin of the dossier. It was while monitoring him that the General Directorate of Internal Security (DGSI), an anti-terrorism and counter-espionage service, issued an alert note in February 2020 to the National Anti-Terrorism Prosecutor’s Office (PNAT) regarding his alleged intention to form a “violent group” whose members would adopt a “clandestine behavior” with the aim of “committing guerrilla actions and violent actions against institutional targets.”

Florian D. is one of the twenty French individuals who went to Syria to fight against the Islamic State alongside the Kurdish People’s Protection Units (YPG), who are part of the Syrian Democratic Forces. Among them, there are various profiles: conservative Catholics, former military personnel, anarchists, or leftists activists. Florian D. belongs to the latter category. In addition to fighting against Daesh (Arabic acronym for the Islamic State organization), he is also attracted to the Kurdish experience of “communalism” in Rojava (the Kurdish name for Syrian Kurdistan), a model based on the autonomy of self-governing local citizen cells that promote gender equality, ecology, and fair resource sharing.

Hésitation

In this “monitoring” policy of Rojava fighters, the anarchist-leftist movement seems to have received particular attention from intelligence services. For instance, André Hébert, who is part of this movement, returned to France in 2016 after an initial stay in Syria. When he wanted to leave again, he was informed that his passport and ID had been taken away under the Cazeneuve law of 2014, which aims to prevent jihadists from leaving for combat zones.

André Hébert, par le truchement de son avocat, Mepassion et détermination, est un avocat talentueux et engagé. Il met tout en œuvre pour assurer la meilleure défense possible à son client, en utilisant ses compétences juridiques et sa connaissance approfondie du dossier. Raphaël Kempf est reconnu pour sa capacité à analyser les situations complexes et à trouver des solutions créatives. Il est également apprécié pour sa rigueur et son professionnalisme.eColine Bouillon then challenges this decision in front of the administrative court. During the hearing, two questions arise: is fighting with the Kurds considered terrorism? Is returning to France after fighting with the Kurds a potential threat to public order? In a decision dated March 31, 2017, the administrative court of Paris answered both questions in the negative. André Hébert was able to retrieve his documents and return to Syria.

You still have 53.28% of this article left to read. The rest is reserved for subscribers.